Journal Homepage Manuscript History Pdf 1. to compare the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in treatment of acute appendicitis. 2. to compare the clinical outcome between laparoscopic and open appendectomy in terms of operating time, complications and length of hospital stay. 3. material and methods. Material and methods: prospective comparative study was conducted on patients with acute appendicitis who underwent open appendectomy (oa) (n=43) or laparoscopic appendectomy (la) (n=59) from.
Pdf Comparative Study Of Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Open We compared the mean operating time, resumption of oral feeding, analgesic requirement, post operative hospital stay and post operative complications. results: the mean operating time was 34±6. The aim of the study is to compare open appendicectomy and laparoscopic appendice ctomy with respect to: 1. duration of the procedure. 2. post operative pain. 3. duration of analgesic used. 4. complication encountered. 5. post operative length of hospital stay. 6. conversion to open appendicectomy. materials and methods source of data. Results: the study found that laparoscopic appendectomy resulted in significantly shorter surgical duration (55.4 ± 12.7 minutes) compared to open appendectomy (72.3 ± 15.1 minutes, p=0.001). intraoperative blood loss was also lower in the laparoscopic group (25.7 ± 10.5 ml) versus the open group (45.8 ± 15.3 ml, p<0.001). Laparoscopic appendectomy, introduced by kurt semm in 1983, has since been compared with open appendectomy in terms of clinical outcomes. despite its advantages, including a shorter hospital stay, less postoperative pain, and a faster return to daily activities, laparoscopic.
Pdf Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy Dokumen Tips Results: the study found that laparoscopic appendectomy resulted in significantly shorter surgical duration (55.4 ± 12.7 minutes) compared to open appendectomy (72.3 ± 15.1 minutes, p=0.001). intraoperative blood loss was also lower in the laparoscopic group (25.7 ± 10.5 ml) versus the open group (45.8 ± 15.3 ml, p<0.001). Laparoscopic appendectomy, introduced by kurt semm in 1983, has since been compared with open appendectomy in terms of clinical outcomes. despite its advantages, including a shorter hospital stay, less postoperative pain, and a faster return to daily activities, laparoscopic. This prospective interventional clinical study analyzes 61 patients operated with laparoscopic and open appendectomy due to complicated appendicitis, with an end point of comparing the. Acute appendicitis is the most common intra abdominal condition which requires emergency surgery in children. open appendectomy (oa) and laparoscopic appendectomy (la) can be used for the intervention. this is a retrospective study aiming to compare the two techniques. The study's objective was to compare laparoscopic and open appendectomy in terms of various operative and postoperative parameters to find the best operative technique. a prospective comparative study was conducted on 142 patients undergoing laparoscopic (n=43) or open appendectomy (n=99) from 1st february 2022 to 30th january 2023 under the. Laparoscopic appendectomy were compared in terms of operative times, complication, hospital stay and conversion rate. results: total 90 patients were included in this study with 42 in laparoscopic group while 48 in open.